The war in Syria, Saudi Arabia stop when you stop sending terrorists

French author Thierry Meyssan in an exclusive interview for long-Presse: the decision was taken to destroy Syria in September 2001 .. It was a focus on the social status of the heart of the system .. The war in Syria, Saudi Arabia stop when you stop sending terrorists

Long-Presse - special - Iyad Jajah - Ayatollah Ali: Translation: d. Rafat Ahmed: His goal was to search for the truth must have to obtain appreciation and respect, and his aim was recast history according to a look civilized honest he must be searching for the truth. Our guest today a writer and political analyst who has dedicated his life to defend the truth and expose lies and misinformation political and international media, to stop in the face of all challenges, defending the right, demanding the truth and take responsibility for historical analysis actually logically and scientifically has had a prominent role in uncovering the secrets of conspiracy to countries carrying cultural heritage. To meet long-Presse today with writer and political analyst Thierry Meyssan. - How do you see the beginning of the reality of the Syrian crisis and the fact that the French and Western involvement in being on the territory of the Syrian Could you Tdona before the truth of the matter whether we are in front of a new colonial era? The French public opinion is not in favor of the issue of neo-colonialism and France's support for the Muslim Brotherhood, the aim is to colonize these countries because the French leadership find that colonialism is the only solution to the deepening economic crisis. The decision to destroy Syria was taken in the fifteenth of September 2001, before the 12 years of our time that day and after the events of September the decision was the occupation of Afghanistan and then Iraq, and then move on to Libya, Syria, and when we talk about the destruction of Syria, therefore, Lebanon, any war on Syria is a war on Lebanon. The fact is that the planned colonial occupation of the Horn of Africa down to Somalia and then move towards Iran. In light of this, and after the fall of Baghdad, was the decision to destroy Syria and those decisions have been taken, regardless of who holds the post of President of the United States because they fall within the policy of alliances and lobbies. I've seen the west of Libya and Syria is part of the great colonial project where these two countries constitute a stumbling block in the way of the Western alliance with the United States in order to impose a new colonial project in the region. The beginning of the leadership in Libya, believes that the decision to destroy them came because of its policy in the face of the West and here was President Muammar Gaddafi was unaware of the plan and thus Khan Gaddafi himself and by the conditions of America in the hope of non-target and to maintain his regime intact. The organizations have been allowed to enter the United States to Libya and working on the ground and Libyan Everyone knows that these organizations is for organizations working under the supervision of the international intelligence services, and everyone knows that Gaddafi is paying for the Lockerbie bombing and then negotiated the delivery of those involved. Through these organizations were recruited quite a number of Libyan citizens who are themselves from the armed movement led military action on the ground. Turning to Syria, the Syrian leadership has considered itself a target because of its policy in addition to Syria's geopolitical location in the region and the leadership of the resistance axis. President Bashar al-Assad was aware of the subject already decided not to compromise on principles and policy work of the Platform for the establishment of the Union in the face of this barbaric attack. After Hariri's death has been accusing Syria of direct and here was the decision of the Syrian, who enjoyed wisdom where taken the leadership of the Syrian decision to withdraw military forces operating in Lebanon, President Assad specifically knew that the United States has taken a decision to war directly if they did not withdraw Syrian military from Lebanon and there is no Syria's intention to return to Lebanon. The Syrian government has pretensions to withdraw from the United States and moved here to the United States an alternative plan in the face of the Syrian leadership. President Obama found himself in an awkward position in front of intervention in Syria, the fact that the U.S. economic profile in a crisis situation and therefore there is the difficulty of direct intervention was the decision to intervene is direct. In November 2010, such as mobility and signed by Britain and France, the decision to establish a military force to intervene in Libya and Syria. At the 2011 meeting was held in Egypt in the presence of the United States and a number of prominent Libyan and Syrian opposition have been studying the possibility of intervention in those countries. In both cases, the main idea was to provide a focus on the social status of the system and the heart of the issue was clear in Libya, but in Syria was not the case and has been a clear focus on the issue of sectarianism and religious discrimination the fact that the Syrian society combines different social strata. - Is what is happening today in Syria is also promoted by the media revolution? The most important question is what the revolution and what is defined and what are the most important results? Revolution is the mobility of a large part of society and the majority of the people involved in this revolution, and the goal is to change the system of governance and to rebuild the country on the basis of clear either be the goal of this movement is to change leaders only, without changing the structure of society then it is not a revolution and the process of changing the president is not a revolution, and thus We have to pay attention to these details and with the intervention of Saudi Arabia in this movement, we find that what is happening is not a revolution. Today we find that Saudi Arabia has intervened in Libya and nothing has changed in the Libyan society and the fact that the events that the demonstrators in the city of Benghazi were aiming to return to the pre-stage of King Idris any goal of mobility is the separation from Libya and the re-division of Libya and therefore it participated in this movement does not know What is the revolution. The real purpose behind the revolutions is to change the pro-Russian regimes after changing leaders allied with Russia and here we mention the issue of color revolutions. We say that not all of what is understood to bear arms is a revolution It's funny that they considered themselves Democrats, and consider themselves revolutionaries in Syria do not know the meaning of the revolution. They consider that the massacres and killings organized revolution and freedom, and here is evident mixing of concepts. In Syrian society, we find that there is a flaw in thinking between supporters and opponents, and has no relation to social class and note on the side of the opposition people do not have the regulator of thought and thus there are two minds completely different and here we are in front of the concepts of conflict. The French public opinion knows that the United States and the countries that revolve Pflkha subject to their policies and America considers itself a control system and control the level of global politics. The Western media treat all other countries, such as Syria, Libya and Egypt through the method of elimination, especially through the presentation of the facts in the Western countries. - What is the point of your vision about raising the issue of espionage United States on a number of the leaders of the West and what is the secret of the timing of detecting this issue? The issue of espionage is not new Since 1990 was a matter of espionage List In 1989 I wrote a series of articles on the issue of espionage, but some economic actors in France prevented the publication of these articles because they were threatening their interests. Now it has become blatant We have approximately 70 million registered phone call and this is the policy of France towards its people. Hence, we find that the European Union had met and announced that he would make decisions characterized by force and it has to be for the United States to provide an explanation about the reality of the subject. There is no relationship between the U.S. openness to Iran and the espionage case, and the debate on the issue of espionage has been raised by Russia, a symbolic issue and we have to say that not only spied a dictator and therefore the State of America's dictatorship. Under the administration of Barack Obama, was to resort to the Espionage Act 8 times, a record in peacetime. Let's leave aside the case of John Koriako, an officer with the "CNN. Aye. Aye", which revealed the arrest and torture of Zubaydah Abe. Far from being a hero, the Koriako is really expensive to convince the public of the alleged confessions extracted from Abe Zubaydah to justify the "war on terror". And Tina herself, Edward Snodan, an employee in the bureau's legal Booz Allen Hamilton, publishing and various documents belonging to the National Agency for the security of the United States confirms spy in China, such as the British spy on the group of twenty guests. The detection system, in particular, about the size of the military eavesdropping on the phones and the Web, which no one can escape it, even if the President of the United States itself. It describes the political class in the United States as "the traitor who must drop it," just because those documents to prevent the National Security Agency to continue to deny their activities known to all for a long time before Congress. - What is your opinion on the approval of Syrian control of chemical weapons and how the impact of that decision on the world public opinion and Western governments? We have to focus on the power and influence of the United States on the decisions of the Western countries, after that Syria agreed to observe chemical weapons agreement realized French public opinion that everything that was raised on the subject of the use of chemical weapons is just a lie. The French people do not understand exactly what is going on in Syria and the French people reject the issue of colonialism. The Russian-American rapprochement process was very shocking for Western countries and this proves that politicians in France do not know the history at all and there is ignorance among French politicians historically. French people still recall in 1956 where the United States has encouraged the Socialists in order to restore the Suez Canal and that was the reason for France's exit from the region. And now practiced USA game itself and France came out of the area again and France today via its government is trying to save face over considered the issue of control and destruction of chemical weapons a major victory and the French people know that there is no chemical weapon equipped for use in Syria and possesses chemical weapons equipped for use in each region The Middle East is Israel only. He was talking about the beginning of the intervention under Chapter VII and this conversation has now ended and all the agreements provide for the day is to say if Syria had not fulfilled its obligations Sttnaakec Western countries, how can it interfere. - What are the prospects of the Geneva Conference and the end of the truth behind the contract? The goal of the Geneva conference is not only for Syria if the Geneva conference is to restore balance in the Middle East by the colonial powers, so to speak. We say that the process of the Geneva Conference comes under the title of sharing the Middle East between Russia and America, and this sharing comes from the viewpoint of an American not Russian. Currently does not exist because of the Sykes-Picot point of view different from America, Russia and now a completely different issue from the standpoint of the People and the world. The United States will accept the presence of forcing Russia and the balance comes across solve the problem in a peaceful manner and political. Geneva conference will discuss the Syrian issue and then the Palestinian issue and the debate will end when Kurdistan and therefore that the conference is to reach concrete results change the face of the region. In my opinion, you can not hold the conference because the alliance has become a Russian Syrian understanding on various things, and there are Russian special forces on Syrian territory and the existence of this special power mean the end of the confrontation between Syria and America. Before the Geneva there was a secret talks between Syria and Russia have suggested Syria form the nucleus of the peacekeepers those talks began in 2008 but the project remained under preparation and project the existence of this force past and allow Russian troops to intervene anywhere in the world and today this in Syria regarding the protection of some areas Only selected for the Syrian army can devote larger against militants. - Some find that there is a new process of sharing in the region and also aim underground resources What is your vision of the conflict currently exists? Even if France got the oil contracts they will continue to support the American project to divide the region There is a difference between the terms of the contract and the contract is French Russian French The contract was a new occupation and exploitation of the decade, the Russian came right for the Syrians and therefore Syria has contracted with the owner of the project optimization. I've made the decision to military intervention in the era of Sarkozy, but since 1991, the United States believes that getting rid of her rival in the international arena, will free up budget warfare, and will enable it to achieve economic prosperity, this began, President George Bush (father) immediately after Operation Desert Storm to reduce Number of formations armies, and so did his successor, Bill Clinton, who went on to promote the further action to reduce military spending. However, the return of Republicans to Congress in the 1995 elections, led to a reconsideration of the issue of war-spending, by returning to the arms, although there are no enemies to fight at that time, to be called neo-conservatives rein to their country to attack the world in order to establish the first global empire. The atheist attacks of September 2001, an opportunity for President George W. Bush (the son) in order to make a decision to invade both Afghanistan and Iraq, and then Syria, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, to end Iran, then Echtmha attack China. I had a budget in the custody of military spending 40% of global military spending. However, it was necessary for this excessive opulence of the end: the economic crisis has forced Washington to carry out the provision in the spending. The outcome of the feet and the Department of Defense to lay off 5 formations of earth and their armies stop funding several research programs. This sharp decline, it was the beginning of a bug that has infected the entire system later. It is now clear that the United States, despite the superiority of its military capabilities on a global twenty countries combined, including China and Russia, but they are no longer able to wage conventional wars and large-scale. Thus we have seen how retreated Washington's decision to attack Syria as soon as the spread of pieces of Russian military fleet in the Mediterranean. Which was imposed on the Pentagon need to be concentrated in the Red Sea in order to launch Tomahawk missiles, which it must also cross the atmosphere of Saudi Arabia and Jordan to reach Syria. As for Syria and its allies of non-state, has waved to launch a regional war that would plunge the United States in a major conflict for her. In an article published by The New York Times, President Vladimir Putin opened fire when pointed out that the "American exceptionalism" is in fact an insult to the question of equality among human beings, and can only lead to disaster. President Obama replied from the rostrum of the United Nations that there is no country in the world, not even Russia, was a wish to bear the burdens of the United States, which has been through its role as world policeman ensure specifically the right to equality between human beings. Obama's intervention were not reassuring: It reaffirmed the superiority of the United States to all countries in the world, did not exceed his vision of the right of equality of human beings, the rights of citizens of his country. Suddenly collapsed magic words while reverberated with applause after a claim Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff, Washington to apologize for having spied on all countries of the world, while condemning the President of the Swiss Confederation power politics pursued by the United States. then went Evo Morales, President of Bolivia even further while a student providing the U.S. president to international justice for crimes against humanity, and was followed by Serbian President Tomislav Nikolic, who denounced the farce of international courts that do not issue judgments only against opponents of the American empire. thus moved scene, criticisms are usually issued for a handful of anti-imperialist, to general uprising even include friends and Washington's traditional. were not the authority of the masters of the world ever, prone to criticize the public as it is now, and this is a pointer to the United States after falling shameful in front of Syria, no longer scare anyone. during the attack on Libya, use the French and British Islamists on a large scale for the overthrow of power in Tripoli, it was not separatists mildly interested in the heart of Muammar Gaddafi's regime after it declared independence Benghazi. When the fall of the mass you personally witness to the reception and to meet with members of the National Transitional Council of the leaders of al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb in the Corinthia Hotel, which became under security protection for the British band came specially from Iraq. It was clear that the next target for Western colonialism is Algeria, where he plays al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, an important role, but I have not seen any dispute could be material to justify international intervention. but Paris thought that Mali could be a gateway for the war in Algeria. before the fall of Tripoli at the hands of NATO, France was able to bribe and restore groups of Tuareg. It was plenty of time for the bestowal of the financing, arming them, but that time it was too late to play a role in Libya. But at the end of the war he returned to the Tuareg Sahraúhm. Vataiwariq people live in the desert on the edge of the central and the so-called easy, in a vast area between Libya and Algeria, Mali and Niger. If they have got to protect Libya, Algeria, Mali and Niger have Tkhalita them. As a result, the Tuareg and since the sixties does not recognize the authority and the rule of Mali and Niger on their land. It was natural that uses Tuareg weapons supplied to them by France to reach their destination in Mali. The movement National Liberation Ozawad seized power in most of the north of Mali, where she lives some Muslim groups of Tuareg Konsar debt attached to al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, who took advantage of the opportunity to impose sharia law in some villages. , and are surprisingly it on 21 March / March last year earned coup Mali's military seized power and an unknown group under the name of the Committee on the revival of democracy and rebuild the country, which had turned President Amadou Toumani Toure, has vowed to restore state authority in the north of the country. But the work of this group coup created a state of shock was not able this group interpret their work nor how can through a military coup to regain power in the north of the country. was a coup very strange, it was supposed to hold a presidential election in the country after five weeks, do not run the President deposed, why the wheel on the coup?. The coup of officers who have been trained in the United States. And prevented the promised elections and delivered the candidate who is close to France Dioncounda Traore to be a transitional president. Has been to legitimize this violation by the President of the Economic Commission for West African Hassan Ouattara, President of Ivory Coast, developed by France at the head of power in Ivory Coast. coup led to foment division tribal in the country, which led to the defection of the commander of the special forces trained by the United States, an officer of the Tuareg, and joining the separatists sons Jant in the north with weapons and ammunition. and proactive was the French presidency has sent troops from the Marine Division paratroopers first, and called in France the name of "colonial" and band 13 paratroopers and a number of helicopters, Mirage and other aircraft bomber and fighter and transport aircraft. really was not expecting that constitute supporters religion is a real danger, because military force fighter and actors are from the Tuareg nationalists who do not have any ambitions in the south and not from the Islamists. has asked France to help a number of countries, including Algeria, which found itself in front of difficult choices: either cooperate with the request of former colonial power France, or to risk and leave the Islamist wave sweeping the country. After hesitation, allowed Algeria to the French aircraft using the airspace. Algeria, but did not survive, it has a group of Islamists unknown broke into one of the most gas wells in the south, continued to BP, and taken hundreds of workers and employees hostage under the pretext that Algeria conspire with France in the financial question. It seems that the goal is to internationalize the issue and transfer to Algeria. seems clear that the technique taken from the French intervention techniques Amiri administration of President George W. Bush, they use Islamic groups for fueling the conflict, and then stretch the pretext to intervene and resolve the problem. Hence the President's speech and restore the French expression «war on terror», which the United States has abandoned its use in her speech. It is important to note that Qatar had expropriated much of the shares of French companies operating in Mali, by contrast, the Emir of Ansar al-Din close to Saudi Arabia. firefighter but is also a magician. France has decided to work the law of emergency security and the application of the so-called Plan Fiji Berat, which is not afraid of the Islamists financial, but the return of jihadists from Syria, where security apparatus French encouraging young Muslims the French to fight alongside the gangs "Free Army", and these seem to have come back to their country, and is likely to rush to defend also for the supporters of religion in Mali, and they are now well versed technologies terrorist they learned in Syria. - What is your assessment of French policy toward Syria and the region? beginning, there is a note significant: when he speaks, Mr. Fabius for the "rebels Syrians," it seems not familiar with the fact attested by the sum of the press, biased to him, the majority of so-called Syrian revolutionaries are not at all. The second observation: when he says Fabius it wants to lift the arms embargo, in order to be sent to Syria, it obscures the fact that this is already the case: France had sent a large quantity of weapons to Syria over the past two years, but did so in a confidential manner and illegal. When he says he wants to "lift the ban", it means that he wants to make it illegal practice already carried out by France, is legitimate, and perhaps an expanded and intensified. So why recoil today on his heels after that was more work in Brussels (as well as the United Nations ) to pay his views forward? I think there are several reasons. The first is that France has made ​​in international forums with a degree of irony at the same time provided a request in New York to vote on a new agreement to combat international smuggling of weapons. And while France has set up a number of arguments in New York, was on the ground in Syria is completely contrary to what is fighting claims in international law. Then there is the external pressure is definitely there. We have formed a company of the United Kingdom, France, Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, frenzied party that wants to jump on Syria, and to continue the systematic destruction of the infrastructure her. But the United States, which contributed to a large feed this arms trafficking during the past two years, also confirms the Americans themselves through leaks that they organized, first in the New York Times and then in several other newspapers over the past three weeks, trying to - on the contrary - to change policy and show that all of this will not only lead to disaster, and continue in this matter will be worse. So, according to all the possibilities, Washington is seeking both London and Paris to abandon a project to legitimize the transfer of arms to Syria. - Are we in a war of civilizations or dialogue of civilizations? As also seems to incite a "clash of civilizations" may disagree, this time for all of the above. The point is not about condemnation here under the guidance of Islam among the peoples of the West, in order to generate feelings of hatred they have against Muslims, but in the orientation of the Muslims themselves, through humiliation, stir hatred they have against the West. It is not "Islam phobia" as it is "defamation of Islam", intended to provoke the anger of Muslims, and then direct them towards specific goals: people in the United States, or from among their allies, the tend to stop the cycle of war, which began on September 11, 2001. It has been shown us now that behind the crowds in Benghazi, there was a commando team ready to attack the consulate, and then attack the villa unlocked guarded, to be used as a withdrawal in the event of a serious problem, and that the goal of the operation, the U.S. ambassador, Chris Stevens in Libya, this man is an expert on Near Eastern Affairs at the Foreign Ministry, known for his pro-imperialist, but it is one of the most anti-Zionist at the same time.This at least is confirmed by Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat, who expressed regret for the death of a diplomat to make great efforts to understand the vision of the Palestinian people, and Avhamha in Washington, too. was necessary to choose a second goal, to punish France for its bias to the positions of the U.S.. known that the Paris refuses to be drawn into War against Iran, also rejects the same time, more sliding in the mud Syrian. Accordingly, it has been spun induction of a new process, they have been used to adopt a satirical magazine many years ago to see the neo-conservatives among the French left. In a proactive step to any results, France suspended immediately Activity twenty embassy and imposed a security system, stressing them. offers French governments herself inside her home country, as a guarantor of freedom of expression. In this approach, they are defending the right of the enemies of Islam to publish drawings depicting him. Here is the government itself, contradict itself when announce a ban on any demonstrations against the film or the magazine, disguised so right supporters of Islam in freedom of expression, despite the fact that freedom of expression, according to the traditions of the French, a former primary condition for democracy. So, they are, no freedom of expression, comes hand in hand with the prohibition of any misuse of defamation or would interfere with the democratic dialogue. - Syria established alliances now well established and began to impose itself as a new pole of global politics in the extent to which Syria has succeeded in its alliances? This has led entering the fray Hezbollah, to the profound changes occurring in the rules of the game. It has moved from the scene of violations committed by the Salafi factions disorganized, and docile by Israel, the warning launched by a major organization, has cells ready to fight any battle in many countries. Hecz and became the "Tel Aviv" is under siege, this time, when she lost control of the protest movement, and it became possible to capsize at any moment against it, because no one seriously Ishq to Hezbollah. In order to come out of this case, the Obama administration has stepped statements reassuring towards Muslims. But, in the total loss of solidarity with her, did not hesitate to condemn the French contradictions, all in the hope that the change of direction of the bolt, and hit Paris. Whatever the case, Benjamin Netanyahu will not stop the practice of pressure. I've managed to force Barack Obama to draw red lines in front of the military's nuclear ambitions, which ascribes to Iran, and the United States entered the war at any time he thinks the Iranians broke those red lines. Francois Hollande led his campaign in terms of condemnation of the disastrous management practiced by his predecessor, Nicolas Sarkozy, as well as his style market review, in advance promises to make immediate changes. Here's more than a hundred days have passed since the election, which certainly change style of governance, but not policies. France is still continuing to dive Bozmadtha, and stubbornly. I have signed Holland into the trap of Nmalth, whereas before that uses the mandate of the Security Council to the protection of Libyan civilians, the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi in an illegal war claimed the lives of 160 thousand civilians, and Here invokes excuses now for not being able to do the same in Syria. , and so went his foreign minister explains innocently artificial, that it is not possible violation of international law, grossly, in air strikes to Damascus, stressing that it is always possible violation of law subtle, through arming terrorists, for example. slider This is not new for us. It has Cascade to destroy the foreign policy legacy of France, three ministers consecutive, the first of whom Bernard Kouchner (independent) and Thanihm Alain Juppe (right-wing) and the last of Laurent Fabius (leftist). has turned France from a country defender Nations, to a port obedient to the theory of Blair's "humanitarian intervention" . they no longer have the ability to even apologize for rudely colonial exploitation: It was Alongloskson spoils of war waged by French troops on the Libyan people, much larger than the spoils of the French themselves. More specifically, the Alongloskson, are will have the lion's share of gas Lebanese, if continued France supplying secret war declared against the Syrian people, and by making itself hated in the Near East. does not seem that the French had reached to the discovery of the relationship, despite the entertainment and media for them very carefully, between their leaders betrayed them to the ruling, and economic problems. again, returning the Syrian crisis to capture the international diplomatic scene. Throughout recent weeks, we have seen the use of dual-wielding for the third time on the Security Council, and vote on a resolution in the General Assembly, and the resignation of the Special Envoy of the Secretary-General of the United Nations. All of this is futile diplomatic incitement came in response to the goals unrelated to the search for peace. did not have any justification for Western countries diplomatic asylum to introduce a resolution at the Security Council, as long as Russia announced its refusal to advance to such a decision. Nor was there any justification to go to the General Assembly of the United Nations to adopt a new resolution, has already taken a similar decision for him. In total, did not have Kofi Annan, any objective justification to resign. there in addition to everything mentioned in the previous song, nothing illegal. As the General Assembly does not have a civil discussion of the issues before the Security Council, only when "there seems to be a threat to the peace, or act of hostility, and so make sure the inability to achieve a consensus among the permanent members, the Security Council fails to exercise its primary responsibilities in maintaining international peace and security ". This does not match with the Syrian case, as long as the supporters of the resolution insist on the presentation of the Syrian crisis as a problem internal exclusively. anyway, not based General Assembly to those "civil" known under "Union for the preservation of peace", however, has inspired Western leaders that are in their possession to go further than that. While based Charter of the United Nations to respect the sovereignty of Member States, it seems "right to intervene", which was formerly called "mission Thoudrah" privilege used by the colonial powers to conquer the world. comes closer Western leaders in condemning the failure of the Security Council of this mentality in particular, Almjavih entirely to the fact : It is true that the Security Council is divided, and this is sure to use the right of veto three times in a row, but it is active, and can not be accused of failing, after adopting three resolutions related to the Syrian crisis (2042, 2043.2059). when divided jury in a criminal court on the issue of rule or criminalize accused issued a not guilty verdict, no one accuses the court of failing to make a ruling. On the contrary, we all gather to say that it has issued a fair decision. And when they turn the Security Council, which is one of the most important references of international law, to reject the resolution submitted to it, are we supposed to recognize that the law is implemented, whether the decision is consistent with our desires, or not. If, did not change any of the parties to the conflict iota of facts on the ground. What has changed actually, is the balance of power players on the Syrian territory, while declined to a faction of the Syrian society for continuing to embrace the armed groups, and to provide support to the Army National Syrian. having lost the armed insurgents Amarthm Islamic Papa Omar, and failed to seize Damascus, and later Aleppo, and found themselves without a safe haven, then Kofi Annan has decided to withdraw from the battlefield in Syria, just as it did in Cyprus in 2004, following the rejection of his peace plan, under a referendum on it. clear here from us the fact that all this agitation. Westerners who do not wish only the good and welfare of the Syrian people, as they claim, in order to supply the armed mercenaries commit massacres on the widest, and represent the worst representation of the Syrian people, who are, no Western leaders, continue to this choice, and will not back down with him. The activity diplomatic Vinhsr in accusations of Russia and China, to the objection of the existence of something called "international law." But that spaniel obedient, called Ban Ki - moon, not fooled by never, when he opened the door of the debate in the General Assembly on Syria, inspired in his text of the resolution before the vote, without being any condemnation, from his position, the Syrian conflict - Syrian. It's "proxy war" are being fought between the great powers, a war that is not intended to, as he put it, to seize Syria, but modified the balance of global power. - Can you tell us about your book, "Great Trick" and the most important reportedly through its pages? "Trick Great, "a book left by tragic events located in the" Lowell Street "America, known in the media events of September 11, but he came to emphasize the fact that these events were all from making and planning of America, in an attempt to catch al-Qaeda to reach the purpose of controlling the region. book is divided into three sections, the first one he lists the events that befell into the twin World Trade, as well as the Pentagon, while reviewing the writer in the second section events of September 11, describing it has been handled as a "Trojan horse" to launch the American war on Afghanistan, and comes third to occur on the fact that the leader of the Al Qaeda bin Laden is the weapon of intelligence was planted by America. America draws its information about the plane striking the Pentagon building is a hijacked plane, but in the book confirmed that the building was blown up by a rocket, and that the impact of the plane did not inferred its existence, which disappeared from the site events, where they described as the "evaporation" plane. the towers collapsed strangely, especially with confirmation firefighters existence of a series of explosions after their collapse, stressing that this type of landslides only occur under the influence of fires only. , and there's involvement by the U.S. administration in the events of September, has been exposed to a number of criticisms, Count me as another conspirator on "The Bush administration" to make the image of the U.S. administration vibrating in the eyes of the Americans, but he found the victims' families convincing evidence about the Bush administration, which has prompted some to raise the lawsuits on the "Bush." ​​He A number of Western specialists Pantviade and refute the analysis and put it in my book about the conspiracy Americans, and do the bombing of the Pentagon, while support me French press, and attributed the reason for Brahina to my ability to use the Internet well, which allowed me to configure popular base made ​​me go out on the range which was discussed by all the newspapers. - go back to talking about the so-called Arab Spring or revolutions for freedom and democracy, what is your reading of the situation? What is the fate of the Kingdom of Saud now? at the beginning of the events were people do not know where the truth in Libya began to question big demonstrations and protests have nothing to do with Gaddafi but during the demonstrations was to provoke the demonstrators because of the killing of some demonstrators, and accused the Libyan government was killing a number of policemen and accused the demonstrators were it was discovered that there is a force Italian is one of the targeted parties and this is what sparked Benghazi and here the same scenario was used in the shield and there are two points of view different from what was on the ground and in the shield was the same subject and thus enables the media to prevent the controversy it. after Obama's election there was cooperation with Russia and in-depth discussion on the reality of global politics new and there was a lack of agreement about Saudi Arabia and when naming the prime U.S. intelligence was part of its plan of action to see the destruction of Saudi Arabia and the elements that have been mentioned began to be implemented now. Arabia established by Britain and dominated by the United States was no agreement on the management of the Kingdom through America and the West knows that Saudi Arabia is under the authority of the United States and everyone is convinced that it is not a state sense of the word and is privately owned by the family of the sons of Saud There is not even financial budget to Saudi Arabia and the king is the one who manages the interests of his own family so that there is no constitution for the country. no countries in the world runs interests such as Saudi Arabia since centuries, it is a country outside of time and agreements are between the family of Saud and America. America helped Al Saud in maintaining governance and contrast are Asudunha oil Add to that facilitates the establishment of Israel. and Israel are located in the Middle East and the United States no longer need to Petroleum Saudi Arabia and Saudi Arabia's oil is sold in China now America has other sources, which is independent of the need for Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia was and remains the title of terrorism in the region and the processing of a trap for Russia in Afghanistan came across it and here we mention that Brzezinski in that era was looking for bin Laden, a specialist projects, road building was later create the cells of bin Laden and lured the army Red and therefore Dart confrontation was the use of these jihadist cells in more than one place and they are now in Libya and Syria. the godfather of these jihadist organizations is Bandar bin Sultan, a party to the basic process and therefore intelligence manages the jihadists in the world. 's support system jihadists is reality and imposed and the United States unable to manage those, and thus created a new condition to control them. , and the U.S. decision provides a scalable system of terrorism and Saudi Arabia do not want to obey America for jihadists which it considers its own army, even if the children of U.S. demand because it manages and finances and move the army according to their own interests. 3-month relationship became demolished between Al Saud and the United States of America and all Saud wish to replace France and Turkey instead of the United States but impossible and Saudi Arabia intervention to re-structure of the fast system which rejects a political solution in Syria and the convergence of American-Iranian who are moving away from reality. has threatened Bandar bin Sultan, President Putin jihadists and desire deals weapon and the threats and intimidation, said Feltman that Saudi Arabia is far from reality and the Security Council elected by the Saudi Ambassador thanked the diplomatic and therefore after 3 hours they refused to run for the seat and this thing did not happen in the Security Council by a meaningless after convergence Russian-American and Al Saud learned that they are now on the sidelines isolated. they rejected him and he Bandar announced the withdrawal of Saudi investments from America and did not believe him until one said Prince Turki that resolution and this is the state policy and politics Arabia's new America. beginning asked Saudi Arabia from Putin to abandon Syria and insulted Russia in the Security Council insulted Russia, China and now insulted If America to where they are going. Saudi Arabia is now closed on itself and declared the continuation of the business jihadist everywhere adversely affect them as they put themselves in front of new difficulties and therefore these options Arabia are drawing U.S. military intervention, which would intervene to regulate the status of Saudi Arabia from the inside. choices are Saudi Arabia is not a game media topic is open, even if it is a game between parties was Bandar spoke in front of the ambassadors of the West. - Syrian crisis as to where and what are your expectations? war continues as long as there jihadists come to Syria and the only system Sender them is Saudi Arabia and when it is removed the obstacle which Saudi Arabia would stop the war. and naturally return safety to Syria and there will be The role of the opposition National in the next government and will include all the spectra of national and will be re-structure of the government to include the opposition. Naturally, there will be no role for those who are sitting outside Syria in luxury hotels and will not have a place in the next government after achieving security and stability. After this ordeal will of the Syrian army's role large a force only legitimate in Syria. Syrian issue when it will be resolved later will solve the Palestinian issue and the United States know that there is no solution for Palestine and peace without Syria, and now there is no solution without solving the Syrian crisis. Whatever the signatories to the peace treaty, there will be another team against peace site and Syria are only able to save the peace process. Yet holding peace with Palestine, Syria will be the protector of the peace agreement and the same people are talking about the departure of President Assad they themselves will say that his presence is credited with bringing peace. should be the reconstruction of Syria, and now there is no ability to rebuild Syria and parties who are able are Qatar, Saudi Arabia, in my opinion, Qatar will pay and Saudi Arabia will pay and did not pay would be destroyed quickly and for the rebuilding of Syria must be tens of years to come. there will be the presence of those who regulates his mind is led by instinct and this type of thinking will end in Syria quickly.